Professor Barry Eckhouse
Welcome to the on-line syllabus for Graduate Management 220: Advanced Management Communication, offered within the Executive MBA Program at Saint Mary's College of California. This syllabus will provide Internet links to electronic resources that will be used in this course. All other matters, including meeting dates, course requirements, and assignments, will appear in final version in the hardcopy course schedule, which will be distributed in class.
NOTE: Please check this on-line syllabus every week for any
recent changes to course readings or addition of practice pages. All
changes and additions to the original hardcopy syllabus will be represented by the
following graphic
, and they will be announced in class
before you will need to access them.
In other cases, I may add a site after we have
completed a class meeting, simply because I am beginning to revise the course for the next
quarter. I will mark that such additions with the following graphic
. When you see this graphic, you are welcome to follow the links, but
you are not expected to be responsible for this material during the present quarter.
If you have any difficulty with this page, any of the links it contains, or sites indicated by those links, please let me know. For information on other on-line sources related to my courses at Saint Mary's, please visit my Faculty Web Page.
Content Links
Week One
Seminar Topic: The
Manager as Editor.
Recent developments in computer-assisted editing. A review of categorical text revision: conciseness, word choice, word order, punctuation, grammar. In-class exercise on categorical editing. Please review the courese pre-reading, Competitive Communication, Chapters 7-11 (as needed) and read Eckhouse, "Desktop Parsing: The Promise of Electronic Editing."
Please go to and read for Week Two
(unless this is part of the pre-readings): Grammar Checkers Promise
Better Writing, Improved Readability,"
(http://www.zdnet.com/~pcweek/reviews/0807/tcheck.html) and The Fog Index
(http://test.finop.umn.edu/homepages/fog.html)
Week Two
Seminar Topic: The
Manager as Editor.
Options for clarity and emphasis at the sentence level. Introduction to structural editing. Recognizing sentence patterns. Coordination and subordination. Sentence combining. Transitional devices. Guest speaker: Marcia Straehley, Pacific Bell and ProComm Consulting.
Please go to and read for Week Three: Argumentation -- Structure
& Support of Propositions (http://www.tcp.com/~prime8/Orbit/MOCR/argument1.html).
Please go to and read for Week Three The Argument Clinic
(http://freethought.tamu.edu/news/atheism/sn-python.html). Read the dialogue until you
lose patience.
Week Three
Seminar Topic: The
Manager as Advocate.
Advanced argumentation. Review of enthymemes and syllogisms. Introduction to the proofline. The pattern of analysis: claim, action, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal. Review of selected arguments written in business and industry.
Assignment: Due for half of the class members next meeting; for the other half, the following meeting - use the proofline to construct an argument from the workplace. Use the selected arguments from business and industry as guidelines to construct your own argument.
For Week Four,
please go to Rhetoric Resources
at Georgia Tech. (http://www.gatech.edu/lcc/lcc1001/rhetoric.html) and read the short
article on "Arrangement."
Week Four
Seminar Topic: The
Manager as Defendant.
Discussion of topics for developing data. Managing opposition. In-class review of the arguments assigned earlier. Each paper will be revised according to comments made in class. Please submit two copies of your final revision, due at a later date.
Week Five
Seminar Topic: The
Manager as Defendant.
Discussion of topics for developing data. Managing opposition. In-class review of the arguments assigned earlier. Each paper will be revised according to comments made in class. Please submit two copies of your final revision, due at a later date.
For Week Six, please go to Stephen Downes: Guide to
Logical Fallacies (http://www.assiniboinec.mb.ca/user/downes/fallacy/fall.htm) and
read sections on the following fallacies:
False
Dilemma
Argument
from Ignorance
Slippery
Slope
Popularity
Attacking the
Person
Appeal to Authority
Hasty
Generalization
False Analogy
Post Hoc
Week Six
Seminar Topic: The
Ethical Manager. Discussion of ethics in argumentation. Intention and consequence in
communication. The ethically suspect: fallacies of reasoning. Some fallacies of
argumentation. Ad hominem; ad verecundiam; ad populum; ad ignorantium; post hoc ergo
propter hoc; tu quoque; ignoratio elenchi, and others.
Peer editing of others papers.
Please read Competitive Communication, Chapter 2.
Week Seven
Seminar Topic: The
Manager as Reporter.
Informative writing and impromptu speaking. Information theory. Short forms of organization. Organization, direction, attention, and retention. Solicitations and responses. Application to impromptu speaking, voice and electronic mail.
Assignment: Due Next Meeting - write an informative memo or letter according to a solicitation (include the solicitation). Also write a solicitation that provides the recipient with a clear organizational device.
Approaches to presenting information. Thinking and speaking on your feet: lecture on impromptu speaking and the impromptu exercise. The principle of the dynamic medium in oral communication. Organization, attention, and retention.
For Week Eight, please go to Minnesota Western Presentation Techniques
(http://minnwest.com/tutorial.html) and read the following links: The Need for Media
Computer-Based Presentations; 35mm Slides; Overhead Transparencies; Flipcharts;
Whiteboards/Copyboards/Noteakers; Handouts; Presentation Ergonomics; Presentation
Strategies; Presentation Software; Visual Design.
Week Eight
The Manager as
Presenter. Moving from monologue to dialogue: the question and answer session.
Strategies for developing credibility. Balancing control with interaction. The use and
abuse of visual aids. Competition in visual presentation. Selection criteria for visual
aids. Timing of visual information. Other considerations in visual presentation.
Week Nine
The Manager as
Presenter. Video-taped oral presentations with question and answer. Please revise
these presentations for delivery during Week Ten.
Week Ten
The Manager as
Presenter. Oral presentations (with question and answer session) revised, videotaped,
and delivered before an invited audience.
Week Eleven
Seminar Topic: The Manager
as Listener. Social styles and their relation to interpersonal communication.
Communication and conflict. Social styles, communication, and the management of sensitive
issues. Listening skills and receiver orientation. Active and passive listening. Guest
speaker: Rebecca Carroll, Associate Professor, Department of Communications, St. Mary's
College.
Course Information: Requirements & Evaluation
Description:
This elective offers you an opportunity to extend both your understanding and practice of principles covered in your first-quarter course in management communication. You will find this elective worth considering if you found your first course valuable but too brief to develop the kind of proficiency you believe you should have as a professional manager. You will also find this elective attractive if you appreciated the kind of emphasis your first course placed on practical application. This elective also assumes that your successful learning depends on frequent application and informed critical comment.
However, unlike the first course, this elective develops your ability to communicate by placing you in a variety of roles that managers and communicators have in common. Thus you will notice that the course schedule is designed around the following seminar topics: The Manager as Editor, The Manager as Reporter, The Manager as Advocate, The Manager as Defendant, The Manager as Speaker, and The Manager as Facilitator. You can expect reading and lecture to offer insight into each of these roles, and you can expect to spend some time performing in each. In addition to this dramatic feature, this elective offers the following substantive topics: advanced editing, advanced argumentation, interaction and the conduct of meetings, and interpersonal communication and question-and-answer technique.
Assignments:
Expect many short assignments: two editorial revisions, an informative solicitation (written or voice mail) and an informative written response, one longer argumentative paper, a revision of that paper, one impromptu talk, one persuasive oral presentation, and participation in a question and answer session. Please note that while this course requires roughly eight assignments, every assignment draws on material from your work place. Unlike the first-quarter course, this elective has no canned-textbook assignments, but this means you must determine the topical content.
If you want help with the assignments or any other area of this course, please give me a call (510-254-4876) or send e-mail (barry@rhetor.com). This class is small enough for everyone to receive individual attention and instruction, but only if you want it. Thus, you will have to make some of the effort here.
Barry Eckhouse has taught communication in management for over fifteen years. Before coming to Saint Mary's, Barry taught in the U.C. Berkeley Haas School Business, where he created and directed their programs in management communications for over ten years. During that time, he also managed Eckhouse and Associates, his Berkeley-based management consulting firm.
Barry received his doctorate from Berkeley in 1977, when he was awarded a doctoral Phi Beta Kappa for his graduate research on theories and techniques of persuasion as they apply to argument in philosophy. He has remained active in the academic research community and has been invited to speak at academic research institutions such as Berkeley, Harvard, and Stanford.
While at Berkeley, Barry created and established a complete program in management communication for graduates and undergraduates, and developed programs in the schools of Architecture and Chemical Engineering. He also created the Haas Competition, a partnership between Levi-Strauss and Berkeley's Graduate School of Business. A mock congressional hearing, this competition requires MBA students to present written and oral arguments to CEOs from leading corporations.
Barry joined Saint Mary's College and Graduate Business Programs in 1979, and now teaches both core courses and advanced electives in the MBA and Executive MBA Programs. In 1989, he received the appointment of Associate Professor, and with it the responsibilities of teaching and designing curricula within the School of Economics and Business Administration. He was promoted to full professor in 1994.
Prior to his full-time appointment at Saint Mary's, Barry served as a trainer, writer, speaker, and advisor in professional development. He has provided professional service to hundreds of clients, and organizations such as Advanced Micro Devices, Amdahl, Bank of America, Bank of Canton, Clorox, Bechtel Power, Bechtel Inc., Citicorp, Electric Power Research Institute, Hitachi Data Systems, Lockheed, Pacific Bell, Pacific Telecom, Rolm, Signetics, SRI International, Utah International, and Xerox.
Barry is the author of Competitive Writing (McGraw-Hill, 1993), Competitive Communication: Classical Rhetoric for Modern Business (McGraw-Hill, 1995), and the forthcoming Uses of Argument in Management (Oxford University Press, 1998).
For details, please see my full curriculum vitae.
The Importance of Managerial Communication
Here is annotated bibliography of references that: (1) argue for offering management communication courses in business programs, and (2) show the importance of communication skills in business. This is a modified version of material prepared by John D. Stegman, The Ohio State University.
Belohov, James A., Popp, Paul O., and Porte, Michael S. "Communication: A View from the Inside of Business," The Journal of Business Communication, 11 (1979): 53-59.
A survey of the attitudes of personnel officers of 250 large organizations concerning the need for communication courses at the graduate level. The survey found that communication skills were rated of "extreme importance" by executives of large organizations, some believing it to be the single most important function of management personnel.
Bowman, Garda W. "What Helps or Harms Promotability?" Harvard Business Review, 42 (January February 1964): 626.
In this survey of Harvard Business Review readers and other executives, the "ability to communicate" is the top-ranked criterion for managers, mentioned by 98.7 percent of respondents.
Connelly, Francis J., ed. "Accreditation Research Project Report of Phase 1," AACSB Bulletin, 14 (Winter 1980): 215.
Survey of over 1000 academic, corporate, nonprofit and societal respondents gave the "manager" (as contrasted with "leader," "administrator," and "trustee") a #1 importance ranking to all interpersonal skills, including "oral communication" and "written communication."
Edge, Alfred G. and Greenwood, Ronald. "How Managers Rank Knowledge, Skills and Attributes Possessed by Business Administration Graduates," AACSB Bulletin, 11 (October 1974): 30-34.
Survey of 430 marketing and personnel managers showed communication as the top skill desired of business administration graduates. Evangelauf, Jean. "Business Schools Urged to Alter Curricula," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 22 May 1985.
The article reported the findings of the Business Higher Education Forum, an affiliate of the American Council on Education. The forum's report stated that: "Business schools should seek to insure that their graduates are competent in oral and written communication, even if the students entered business programs with poor communications skills."
Fielden, John. "Educating Tomorrow's Executives," Harvard Business Review, 38 (November December,1960): 618-23.
Heisler, W. J. "Promotion: What Does it Take to Get Ahead?" Business Horizons, 21 (April 1979): 57- 63.
Survey of 200 MBA students at "two nationally renowned universities" placed "ability to communicate clearly and concisely" first in the list of "Value of Promotion Factors."
Hildebrandt, J. W., Bond, F. A., Miller, E. L., and Swinyard, W. W. "An Executive Appraisal of Courses which Best Prepare One for General Management," The Journal of Business Communication, 19 (Winter,1982): 515.
This ongoing study summarizes 1980-81 data from 1158 newly promoted executives in the United States who answered this question: "Assuming the study of business administration best prepares a young person for a career in general management, how important are the following courses as part of that preparation...." Business Communication, oral and written, was the course selected as "very important" more often than any of the other thirteen courses.
Hunger, David J., and Wheelen, Thomas L. "A Performance Appraisal of Undergraduate Business Education," Human Resource Management, 19 (Spring,1980): 24-31.
This is a survey on undergraduate business education of Business School Deans and Personnel Executives. "Both deans and personnel executives feel that undergraduate business education needs to focus primarily on the 'basics,' e.g., developing logical thinking and communication skills."
Kiechel, W. "Harvard Business School Restudies Itself," Fortune, 18 June 1979: 4858.
"FORTUNE recently interviewed recruiters from a crosssection of businesses that routinely hire high-priced MBAs . . . the most frequent observation was a simple wish that business schools do a better job teaching their students to write and speak effectively."
Stolzenberg, Ross M., Abowd, John, and Giarruso, Roseann. "Abandoning the Myth of the Modern MBA Student," Selections, The Magazine of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Autumn 1986:921.
This article presents the preliminary summary report of GMACs New Matriculants Survey obtained from more than 2,000 students at 91 graduate schools. Respondents rated "communication skills" as the top "personal attribute to becoming a successful manager." Communication skills were rated as "very important" by 89 percent of the respondents. The study "suggests that students are more likely to choose a business school to become better communicators than to become better analysts."
![]()